The war for sharing added a new chapter with the choice of Santiago Perez Ponsthe young Minister of Economy of the Chaco government of Jorge Capitanich, as president of the strategic Federal Tax Commission (CFI), despite the disenchantment of the districts aligned in Together for Change. The crack over the co-participation debate promises to widen claims, reproaches and needs in the fight for the funds that the national government distributes among the provinces, and that the Supreme Court of Justice he had to mediate before the cut made by the central administration with the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA).
as far as he could tell Perfil.com from government sources, the arrival of a provincial official with a good link with Kirchnerism It can open a new chapter in the debate for the federal distribution of the co-participation and, even, incorporate the National Congress in the dispute. At least, in the middle of the electoral year, the fight for funds could intervene in the humor of the debate agenda, something that the Casa Rosada expects and that Together for Change wants to avoid so as not to end up in a kind of remake of the fight between federals and unitaries.
Does co-participation work as a tool to help the poorest provinces?
Who is Santiago Pérez Pons?
Pérez Pons was one of the pioneers of the presentation of the provinces for resist the amparo ruling that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of CABA, for co-participating funds. With a recent stint at the Ministry of Economy, where he was key in making decisions to save the economy during the pandemic, the official from Chaco is considered one of the staunch defenders of the Kirchnerist position in the fight that broke out between the national administration and the Buenos Aires head of government, Horacio Rodriguez Larreta.
What is the Federal Tax Commission
The IFC is a control and inspection body of the Federal Tax Coparticipation, made up of representatives of all the affiliated treasuries: the national State, the 23 Argentine provinces and CABA. “Among its main functions is to control and supervise the transitory regime for the distribution of fiscal resources and it is empowered to advise the National Congress,” they highlighted from the environment of the new president of the IFC.
A little less than a year ago, and before the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Buenos Aires, the IFC had issued a technical report aligned with the Nation’s position on the resources that correspond to the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires in concept of the transfer of security powers to the Buenos Aires area. The governors, through the agency, rushed to make available to the highest court of justice a position with political and technical weights in the name of tax federalism. This initiative was not echoed by the courtiers, who handed down a Solomonic ruling, acknowledging the Buenos Aires claim to recover the withheld funds, but to a lesser extent than the request, since He recognized 2.95 percent of the mass of co-participating taxes, and not the 3.5% required.
Co-participation: the Government asked the Supreme Court judges to excuse themselves “for reasons of decorum”
“The IFC is in charge of ensuring a fair application of the laws in force so that no province is harmed by unilateral or unfounded decisionseither by the Nation or by our Congress”, affirmed Pérez Pons, who also called for an alignment of the provinces to be able to debate the federalism of the distribution of taxes carried out by the Nation.
The sharing dispute
Three provinces, in addition to CABA, preferred to abstain in the vote. Rodríguez Larreta got the radical governors Gerardo Moralesfrom Jujuy, Rodolfo Suarezfrom Mendoza, and Gustavo Valdez, from Corrientes will make it clear that the initiatives that arise from space against the interests of the Buenos Aires leader will be observed or vetoed. The economic power of the City is one of the strengths for the image of the City’s management, which puts the opposition alliance in conditions of electoral competitiveness.
The governors, through the IFC, will seek to bring a proposal to the National Congress to define, in “political terms”, the way in which co-participation funds are distributed, without the need for Justice to mediate between tensions. “If we talk about distribution, we talk about politics”, sentenced Pérez Pons in his assumption.
On the Nation’s side, the dispute was led by the Minister of the Interior, Edward “Wado” Of Peter, one of the officials who reports directly to Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, and with a direct relationship with the provincial leaders, both Peronist and independent. After having woven relations with the league of governors, the hand in hand with Rodríguez Larreta was with the federal tribune in the background. The porteño was only accompanied by Suárez from Mendoza when most of the provinces supported the technical report against the City’s claim.
ED
You may also like
Source link
