The leader of the Civic Coalition (CC) Elisa Carrion filed a complaint against the mayor of the Buenos Aires party of Pilar, Federico Achavalfor tenders that would have been carried out “irregularly” to benefit businessmen close to him. Among the defendants are municipal officials who they would have awarded contracts to members of their families.
The judicial presentation was made by the leader of Together for Change and the president of the CC de Pilar, Matias Yofebefore the Attorney General of the General Department of San Isidro, John Broyad. Through the letter, they requested that the possible investigation be commission of crimes of corruption in the aforementioned municipality as a result of a report published by the local media The Dissent.
The US denounced that Argentina has “numerous cases of corruption” and an “ineffective and politicized” judicial system
The investigation indicates that tenders were held presumably tomorrowin which people close to Achával, from the Front of All. Among those mentioned is Hector Torresdescribed in the publication as a “multi-item supplier, registered with AFIP in August 2020 and which quickly became in the star of the current management”, who would act as an intermediary in the aforementioned operations.
“In the municipality of Pilar, for any need There is a saying: Call Torres!“, says the article. In this sense, the report indicates that behind “a school of individuals and legal entities” it’s found Patrick Alexander Naughtoncoordinator of the Municipal Purchasing Department.
The press release released by the Civic Coalition explains that Naughton would have “awarded tenders to people in his family through fraudulent maneuversclearly detrimental to the municipality.” Some of the people who would have been involved would be his wife and mother-in-law.
“It should be noted that this lack can matter economic damage to the provincial governmentwhile it could be deprived of going to the market and potentially obtaining better offers”, indicates the text of the complaint filed by Carrió and Yofe.
“This situation has been repeatedly valued in the jurisprudence to consider the commission of fraud due to fraudulent administration against the Public Administration (article 174 subsection 5, based on article 173 subsection 7 of the Penal Code), one of the crimes linked to corruption with the highest penalty,” he continues.
Finally, they considered that “it is satisfied with the violation of the duty to respect a legal contracting mechanism that corresponds to each case —public bidding— through which better prices could have been obtained”.
FP/nt
You may also like
Source link
